The Rules, published in full · Rules v2026.3, current through July 1, 2026
Every number this engine uses, and the statute behind it.
This page is the whole eligibility engine. Nothing in your Answer comes from anywhere else.
It is here so an attorney, a case manager, or you can check our work against the statute.
Every table below is generated from the same file the Check reads, so this page cannot fall behind the product.
- Version
- Rules v2026.3, current through July 1, 2026
- Law read through
- July 1, 2026
- Attorney review
- Not yet complete. Colorado attorneys have been asked and offered payment for the time. Until one signs a dated note, the only warrant behind these numbers is this page.
- Where it lives
- The numbers in one file, the branching in another. The engine holds no words: it returns dates and citations, and English and Spanish render the same arithmetic.
What the Check tells you about one case
Seven facts per case, and no prediction of what a judge will do.
| Output | What we mean by it |
|---|---|
| Relief Path | Which of the three sealing statutes applies to this case. |
| Clock starts | The later of final disposition and the end of probation, parole or jail. |
| Eligibility Date | The first month a motion may be filed. Not a prediction that it is granted. |
| Automatic Date | The month the state's own clock reaches the case under Clean Slate. |
| The Gap | Automatic Date minus Eligibility Date, in years and months. |
| Forms | The JDF numbers that carry this relief in Colorado. |
| Statute | The citation the answer came from, printed on the Answer itself. |
The waiting periods
Months from the start of the clock. The clock starts at the later of final disposition and the end of probation, parole or jail.
| Class | By motion | By the state | The Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civil infraction | 1 year | 4 years | 3 years |
| Petty offense | 2 years | 7 years | 5 years |
| Misdemeanor | 3 years | 7 years | 4 years |
| Felony | 5 years | 10 years | 5 years |
- The Gap is the reason this company exists: the years you could have been sealed and were not.
- Some class 2 and 3 misdemeanors and lower felonies open sooner than the class row shows. We say so as a caveat rather than modelling it, which is the first thing we want corrected.
- Automatic sealing began in July 2024 and older cases are worked through in batches. An Automatic date in the past is a statutory clock, never a promise that it happened.
The money, and who is paid it
None of the money below is ours. The one payment we take is $49 for the Filing Packet, and the Answer is free whether you buy it or not.
| Item | Amount | Paid to | Authority we cite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion to seal a conviction | $65waived on a finding of indigency | the court | C.R.S. § 24-72-706(1)(h) |
| Motion to seal a non-conviction | $0 | nobody | Judicial Branch fee schedule |
| Petition to seal an arrest, no charges filed | $224 | the court, as a new case | Judicial Branch fee schedule |
| Your CBI criminal history check | $6 | Colorado Bureau of Investigation | cbi.colorado.gov |
House Bill 24-1133 files the conviction motion into the criminal case that already exists, so no case-opening fee is charged on top of the $65.
The statute behind each path
| Relief Path | Cited on your Answer | Forms |
|---|---|---|
| Conviction sealing | C.R.S. § 24-72-706; C.R.S. § 13-3-117 (automatic) | JDF 612, JDF 615 |
| Non-conviction sealing | C.R.S. § 24-72-705; C.R.S. § 24-72-704 (automatic) | JDF 477, JDF 478 |
| Arrest, never charged | C.R.S. § 24-72-704 | JDF 417, JDF 418 |
| Procedure, and when we refuse to answer | C.R.S. § 24-72-703 | — |
The forms, and what we leave blank
The motion or request first, then the order a judge signs. Both are free from the Colorado Judicial Branch, and you can file them yourself without us.
We fill the caption, the case number and who you are. Every statutory election, and the signature, we leave blank for you.
What the statute excludes
No waiting period reaches these. When one applies we say so, and no Filing Packet is offered for that case.
- Driving under the influence, C.R.S. § 42-4-1301
- An offense involving unlawful sexual behavior
- An offense whose factual basis involved domestic violence
- A crime of violence, or a class 1, 2 or 3 felony
- Child abuse, or an offense against a child
- Only class 1 or 2 misdemeanor traffic offenses, or class A or B traffic infractions
Listed in full on page 3 of JDF 612. Whether this list is complete and fairly worded for a layperson is the correction we want most.
The branches, in the order the engine takes them
The first one that matches decides the case. Read top to bottom.
01
The case was in a municipal court
Flagged. City courts run their own sealing process, and we say so instead of applying the state clock to it.
02
You are not sure how the case ended, or no usable month is known
We refuse to answer, and list the free ways to find out. Nothing is sold on a guess.
03
Dismissed, dropped or acquitted
Non-conviction path, no waiting period, no court fee. We also tell you the court is supposed to seal it without being asked.
04
Arrested and never charged
Arrest-record path, sealable once the time limit to charge has passed. We flag that limit as the thing to check.
05
Convicted, and the offense is on the excluded list
We say the statute excludes it and name the subsection. No Filing Packet is offered, and no waiting period is quoted.
06
Convicted, but something in the record blocks it
A conviction since, a case open now, or restitution still owed. We say what has to clear first and sell nothing.
07
Convicted, and clear
Eligibility is the clock plus the motion period, Automatic is the clock plus the state period. If the Automatic Date has passed we say the case may already be sealed and tell you to check before spending anything.
08
Convicted, and the class is unknown
We give a range from petty through felony, and offer the packet only when even the longest clock has already run.
What this engine will not do
- We never say a court will grant the motion. The Eligibility Date is the first month it may be filed.
- We never fill a statutory election or sign anything for you.
- We never take an email address before an Answer exists, and we ask for a name only after a packet is bought.
- Where the statute leaves a judge discretion, we say so in those words rather than guessing which way it goes.
- When we guess your offense class from the words you typed, you confirm or override it, ties resolve to the more serious class, and “not sure” widens the answer instead of narrowing it.
Where we most want to be corrected
Ranked. These are the five questions we put in writing to Colorado attorneys, and they are open until someone answers them.
01
C.R.S. § 24-72-706(2)
Is the exclusion list complete, and is it worded fairly for someone reading it alone?
This is the branch that tells a person no. Getting it wrong in either direction is the worst error this product can make.
02
C.R.S. § 24-72-706(1)
Are four class rows the right granularity, or should the shorter clocks be modelled?
Some class 2 and 3 misdemeanors and lower felonies open sooner. Today that is a caveat in words rather than a number.
03
HB 24-1133
Should a successfully completed deferred judgment have its own branch?
We treat it as a non-conviction with no waiting period. There is no separate deferred-judgment branch, and we are not certain there should not be.
04
C.R.S. § 24-72-706(1)(h)
Are the fee figures current in every judicial district?
The fee is the number a person acts on the same week. We were already wrong about it once, by $159, until someone quoted the statute at us.
05
C.R.S. § 24-72-706(1)(b)
Is “the later of disposition and the end of supervision” the right clock start in every case?
Every date we print moves if this is wrong, including the Gap. It is the single assumption with the widest reach.
If we are wrong
Tell us which line and what it should say. A correction changes one file of numbers and one file of branches. hello@unburdened.nanocorp.app
We publish corrections the day we get them, and the version on this page changes with them. Rules v2026.3 shipped one day after the Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition quoted the fee statute at us.
This is legal information, not legal advice
Unburdened is not a law firm and no one here is your attorney. We read the statute and do the arithmetic; the motion is yours to file.